Archive for March, 2005

Mar 31st 2005 Douglas Rushkoff

We think of a medium as a thing that delivers content. But the delivered content is a medium in itself. The many forms of content we collect and experience online are really just forms of ammunition, an excuse to start a discussion with that attractive person in the next cubicle…

That’s why the most successful TV shows, Websites, and music recordings are generally the ones that offer the most valuable forms of social currency to their fans…

If you are creating online content, your success will be directly dependent on your ability to create excuses for people to talk to one another. The real measure of content’s quality is how well it serves as a medium.

The next big thing for the Internet and humanity alike, then, is the realization that our media has served as little more than excuse to interact with one another. Once we make that leap, we will most likely come to wonder what it’s all for. Why do we have this overwhelming urge to interact by any means (or medium) available?
— Douglas Rushkoff

No Comments » Posted by Administrator / Content / Context and Culture

Mar 30th 2005 Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR)

A man who has never gone to school may steal from a freight car, but if he has a university education he may steal the whole railroad.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR)

No Comments » Posted by Administrator / Ethics

Mar 29th 2005 James Krohe Jr.

The famous concern for “legacy” among older execs often is little more than a tacit confession that the power and perks for which one clawed one’s way to the top are no longer satisfying.
James Krohe Jr.

No Comments » Posted by Administrator / Career and Work

Mar 28th 2005 Carl Barnhill

People from the military have a higher internal drive for excellence. We see that they’re self-policing. They have less of a disposition to blame outside events or organizational issues for lack of success. They typically are self-driven and have a higher moral compass, as well. In military terms, given a mission, they set out to achieve it without a whole lot of oversight.
Carl Barnhill

No Comments » Posted by Administrator / Human Resources

Mar 27th 2005 Josh Kopelman

I think there are too many people who try to change consumer behavior. That’s really expensive. When an entrepreneur tells me he or she wants to educate the market, I run the other way.
Josh Kopelman

No Comments » Posted by Administrator / Entrepreneurship

Mar 26th 2005 Arun N. Maira

Any firm is a bundle of interlocking business processes overlaid by organization policies, permeated by unwritten rules of behavior, and constrained by its resource structures.
Arun N. Maira

No Comments » Posted by Administrator / Organizational Behavior

Mar 25th 2005 Russell L. Ackoff

We live a hypocrisy when we pursue democracy in the public sphere but accept autocracy, often fascistic, in our corporations.
Russell L. Ackoff

No Comments » Posted by Administrator / Miscellaneous and Organizational Behavior

Mar 25th 2005 Russell L. Ackoff

In a company that functions as an internal market economy, every part of the corporation that has at least one internal and one external customer operates as a profit center. All other parts operate as cost centers, each of which is part of a profit center. (This does not mean profit centers must be profitable. Most corporations maintain unprofitable units for various reasons, such as prestige.) Profit centers are free to buy whatever goods or services they want from whatever sources they want at whatever prices they want. Similarly, they are free to sell their output. These purchasing and selling decisions may be overridden by higher-level authorities who, when they do so, must pay the additional costs involved in case of a purchase, or compensate the units involved for lost profit. These higher-level authorities must themselves operate as profit centers whose income derives from a tax used to cover only the cost of their operations and from income generated by the capital they provide to, or invest in, their subordinate units.

An internal market economy provides managers with the information they need to run their businesses efficiently and effectively. It makes benchmarking unnecessary and avoids the need for the massive downsizing now so common among large corporations. It creates opportunities for internal synergy and provides a measure of its costs and benefits. It reduces internal conflict, because those who associate by choice tend to get along better than those who have cooperation forced on them. It allows inefficient parts of a corporation to go out of business, thus enabling a corporation to make effective make-buy decisions on services as well as goods. It also enables efficient parts of the corporation to grow profitably by selling their output externally as well as internally. And it enables the corporation to decide when one of its units would be better off outside than inside the organization. Finally, contrary to popular rationalization, it reduces accounting, because while each profit center is required to provide only a P&L statement and a balance sheet to higher authorities, those authorities must pay for any other information they want. It should be noted that in such an economy, most managers become general managers.
Russell L. Ackoff

No Comments » Posted by Administrator / Management and Strategy

Mar 24th 2005 Robert M. Tomasko

Most corporate structures use inappropriately sized building blocks: jobs. Most work is either too small or too big for one job. Jobs are also very static entities – dangerous in the long run to the health of both the jobholders and the companies they work for. In many companies, jobs need to be eliminated completely – while retaining the workers.

In cases where the work is too big for any one individual, organize around teams instead. Don’t also designate individual positions; you will just pollute the team concepts. Make sure team (not individual) performance is evaluated and rewarded. For teams to reach their full potential and not just be “window dressing,” they can’t be add-ons or overlays. They must be the basic unit of organization,

When most work comes in units smaller than the traditional job, replace employees’ jobs with portfolios of assignments. Jobs get taken for granted, go on forever, and tend to come in eight-hour workday packages. Assignments have a sense of fluidity, with a clear beginning, middle, deadline, and observable output. They can more easily accommodate flextime and telecommuting. Sometimes the best way to eliminate the “it’s not in my job description” lament is by eliminating the idea of the job.
Robert M. Tomasko

No Comments » Posted by Administrator / Organizational Behavior

Mar 23rd 2005 Robert J. Dolan

All successful pricing efforts share two qualities: The policy complements the company’s overall marketing strategy, and the process is coordinated and holistic … Proper pricing requires input from a number of people, but if there is no mechanism in place for creating a unified whole from all the process, the overall pricing performance is likely to be dismal.
Robert J. Dolan

No Comments » Posted by Administrator / Marketing